The BIBLE is FICTION

The Bible is PURE  FICTION

Here is an article takenfrom www.vatileaks.com which provides the evidence that the Bible is not the word of god because it’s simply not true. Please visit this site for further information on the fraud that is religion.

 bible2For centuries now, the Church and biblical scholars presented the stories in both the Old and New Testaments as historic recollections of the past but in modern times this assumption has been radically challenged, and it is now academically accepted that there is no archaeological or historical evidence to support any of the biblical stories as factual events. That includes the story of Jesus Christ.  Pious Jews universally accept what is written in the Old Testament as historical fact, but over the past century or so, a plethora of archaeological evidence has emerged in support of the reality that the Bible is a book composed entirely of imaginary tales, and the patriarchal narratives within its pages are illusory. It is universally admitted that for many decades now, grave doubts have existed among experts about the reality of the biblical stories and, for the sake of illustration, it is noted that some sixty years ago, the Chairman of the International Congress of Old Testament Studies issued this warning to delegates at a global conference: ‘Great reserve must be practiced before claiming a known historical context for these people and narratives [in the Old Testament] that reflect an exceedingly complex history of transmission’.

The mid-Seventies saw the publication of a number of new and innovative archeologically-based reports and serious academic journals that changed the direction of research across the entire field of biblical studies. Whatever one’s religious conviction, it would be remiss of anyone to ignore the impressive and growing evidence from what must be described as massive archaeological examinations by experts in their field of expertise over ten decades.

Concealed information revealed

In 1992, and fuelled by the publication of a best-selling book by one of the world’s foremost and most esteemed authorities on biblical archaeology, Professor Thomas L. Thompson (‘The Early History of the Ancient Israelites’, Professor Thomas L. Thompson, E. J. Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1992), the international media released headline news that ‘The first ten books of the Old Testament are fiction’. Those books are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, Samuel (1 and 2, combined as one) and Kings (1 and 2, combined as one). It was the findings of the erudite Professor Thompson (Associate Professor of the Marquette University in Milwaukee; Chair of Old Testament Studies, University of Copenhagen; August, 2005) that stunned the religious world and publicly revealed that the Bible is not a record of past events.

bible1

False biblical allegations

The Professor’s conclusions centre primarily on the city of Jerusalem and his all-embracing findings have the backing of international experts, including the British Museum and Harvard University. Of what the world has been told about the Bible, he said this in a later book: ‘The conclusions of those who educated the current generation and formed the foundation for almost all currently written books are no longer accepted or acceptable … what was presented as the assured results of decades of science and scholarship amount to careless assertions’. (‘The Bible in History, How Writers Create a Past’, Professor Thomas L. Thompson, Pimlico, London, 2000).  The implications for the Church are profound, and with the onset of a new generation, research on the nature of the Bible has entered a groundbreaking phase that has seen rapid change and innovation in our approach to biblical thinking. The lack of archaeological evidence to support stories in the stories in the Bible is a serious challenge to both Judaism and Christianity, and Professor Thompson added this learned comment: ‘We can now say with considerable confidence that the Bible is not a history of anyone’s past’. (‘The Bible in History, How Writers Create a Past’, Professor Thomas L. Thompson, Pimlico, London, 2000)

The modern-day Church knows this is true, confessing that the stories in the Torah ‘have been fictitiously projected backwards’ (New Catholic Encyclopedia, Vol., ii, p. 656), and this statement is supported by another learned opinion that says, ‘we are not able to speak of any portion of the Torah as history’ (Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol. III, 11th Ed. 1910, p. 864). On the whole then, the Church confirms that ‘no certain chronology of the Old Testament is at present attainable’ (ibid), and that is one way of saying that the Bible is not historical. Another learned statement is drawn from the records of the venerable Professor Thompson: ‘The question today is whether the Bible in its stories is talking about the past at all‘. (The Bible in History, How Writers Create a Past, Professor Thomas L. Thompson, Pimlico, London, 2000, p. 205)

The point is that organized religions have a major economic interest in maintaining literal interpretation of both Old and New Testaments, for when the true nature of the Bible is fully absorbed, the entire edifice of both Judaism and Christianity are revealed as false. The arguments against the historicity of the Old and New Testaments are now universally accepted by the academic and archaeological world, and to believe their data as history is a serious error. Professor Thompson presents this truth: ‘The historicity of biblical narrative has not been established and should not be assumed’. (‘The Messiah Myth’, Professor Thomas L. Thompson, Basic Books (a member of the Perseus Group), New York, 2005). Decades of archaeological results of a new generation of scholars have revealed that Moses, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Solomon, David, and Saul never lived, nor is there any support for the occurrence of an ‘exodus’ of 600,000 men and their families. Noah’s Ark has never been found, nor Solomon’s Temple or the fallen stone walls of Jericho, and there is no verification for the existence of the twelve tribes of Israel, not even in the records of Herodotus (484-430 BCE) who never mentioned the Israelites at all.

bible3

Ten Commandments plagiarised

It is just as strange that the eighty ‘great golden cities’ that King Solomon was supposed to have built do not exist. The name of Solomon is not recorded by Plato, or by any earlier historic writer of standing, and, like Moses, appears only in the Bible. Professor Thompson neatly summed up the situation: ‘Not only is the Bible’s ‘Israel’ a literary fiction, but the Bible begins as a tradition already established: a stream of stories, song and philosophical reflection: collected, discussed and debated’.  (‘The Bible in History, How Writers Create a Past’ (Professor Thompson, Pimlico, London, 2000).

That conclusion is supported with the revelation that the Ten Commandments were not new codes of conduct invented for the Israelites, but newly restated versions of the ancient pharonic confessions from Spell No. 125 in the Egyptian Book of the Dead. There is no historical evidence of primary Old Testament characters ever living or the events surrounding them existing in the records of antiquity, and they cover thousands of years. Professor Thompson adds (ibid, p. 99); ‘The Bible’s language is not an historical language’ and concludes that, ‘the patriarchs of Genesis are not historical’ (ibid, p. 190) adding, ‘the point to grasp is that the Bible’s stories of Saul, David and Solomon aren’t about history at all, and to treat them as if they were history is to misunderstand them’ (ibid, p. 206).

Bible not credible

The findings of Professor Thomas Thompson and other archaeologists support the now-accepted belief that a person called Moses never existed in physical reality, and that creates exceptional problems for the Christian presentation of Jesus Christ. The name of Moses is documented 79 times in the New Testament and sentences carrying his name involve more than 690 words. In one twelve-verse episode, Gospel writers, assuming that Moses once existed, have him materialize with Elijah from centuries in the biblical past and appear physically in front of Jesus and three associates (Mark 9:4). In Church parlance that peculiar event is called the ‘transfiguration’ and few believing Christians yet realize just how many narratives need to be deleted from the New Testament when current archaeological, geological, scroll discoveries, and confessed forgeries, are recognized and honestly evaluated.

The modern Church concedes that Moses never wrote the books of the Bible that it maintained for centuries that he did. Up until the late 1960’s, millions of Bibles carried the words, ‘The Books of Moses’ in their Subject Index and page-headings when they referred to the writings of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, but Bibles printed since then have quietly deleted those words. Allowing for the huge variation of time quoted above, ultra-orthodox Christian experts bought the creation of the Old Testament forward by around 1000 years, a vastly different period to their claims of just three decades ago. The latest archaeological and geological evidence destroys any credibility the Church places on the Bible as a book of history and that includes the Gospels of the New Testament.

The latest archaeological and geological evidence destroys any credibility the Church places on the Bible as a book of history, and this conclusion includes the Gospels of the New Testament. That brings us to a vital point. The bloodline given in the Old Testament that descends from kings David and Solomon and was subsequently used in the Gospels to include the personage of Jesus Christ. King David is mentioned 68 times in the New Testament and King Solomon’s name is recorded 12 times. The genealogies in the Gospels say that Jesus Christ was a direct descendant of those intangible kings with his bloodline extending from ‘Jesus to Joseph to … David the king. David but generated the Solomon’ (Matt 1:6). Professor Thompson adds, ‘It is not historical realities that created the genealogies’, meaning that the dynastic king lists in the Bible are fictitious, and many authors assume that these artificial characters are historical people. To say anybody descended from David is historically unsupportable and books claiming that Jesus Christ was of King David’s bloodline have been outdated by archaeological circumstances. Certain authors try to make Jesus Christ heir apparent to the biblical royal house of David, but there was no Davidic succession in the history of the world. A bloodline from a so-called House of Judah never existed because kings David and Solomon are fictitious personalities, being nothing more than literary creations in an ancient theological Manuscript Tradition that existed since the establishment of the religious library at the great temple of Atesh Behram at Samarkand in 1400 BCE. This is a truly historic political secret, and its reality nullifies the claims of all authors who accept a surface reading of the Bible as literal.

bible4Fictitious Gospel narratives

How does that affect our premise? A Judaic Royal dynasty never existed in historical reality and there is no royal bloodline emanating from a Davidic line because there was no Davidic line. The Gospels say that Jesus Christ was the patrilineal descendant of kings David and Solomon … of Abraham, Jacob and Judah, before that. Combined with the lack of archaeological discoveries and admitted Gospel forgeries, references to Kings David or Solomon in the New Testament are fictitious, and the inclusion of their names in a genealogy developed by the Church for Jesus Christ indicates an intention to deceive. The quest for an historical patriarchal period has proved unsuccessful, and Professor Thompson completes the argument: ‘There is no room for an historical United Monarchy, or for such kings as those presented in the biblical stories of Saul, David and Solomon. The early period in which the traditions have set their narratives is an imaginary world of long ago. It never existed as such. In the real world of our chronology, only a few dozen very small, scattered hamlets and villages supported farmers in all the Judean highlands. Altogether they numbered hardly more than two thousand persons’.  (‘The Bible in History, How Writers Create a Past’, Professor Thomas L. Thompson, Pimlico, London, 2000, p. 206)

Professor Thompson added that ‘my finding no place for David or his empire in my history of Israel created a scandal’ (ibid) and it created grave problems for the Christian Church’s presentation of its New Testament. When the names of Saul, David, Solomon and Moses, and other mythical Old Testament characters are removed from the Gospels of the New Testament, the entire structure of Christianity collapses. The consequences are fatal to the pretence of Divine origin to the entire New Testament and expose Christian texts as having no special authority. This knowledge has a direct effect on the Jesus Christ story and adds another dimension to its ‘fabricated development’ (‘The Forged Origins of Christianity’, Tony Bushby, Nexus New Times, vol. 14, No., 4, June-July, 2007). For this reason alone, the story of Jesus Christ must been seen for what it is: ‘A politically inspired and purposely maintained money-making myth’ (ibid). This view is supported in Professor Thompson’s book, ‘The Messiah Myth’ (Basic Books, A Member of the Perseus Books Group, USA, 2005), in which he argues that a quest for the historical Jesus is pointless, because Jesus Christ of the Gospels never existed.

WHAT DIVINE RIGHT TO RULE?

storyThe divine right to rule is purely a biblical construct. The apostle Paul, in Romans ch.13:1-5 says: “Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, he who rebels against authority is rebelling against what God has instituted and those who do so will bring judgment against themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and he will commend you. For he is God’s servant to do you good. But if you do wrong be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. He is God’s servant an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore it’s necessary to submit to the authorities not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience.” So in a literal reading of the Bible it indicates that once a governing authority is in place people must believe that those ruler’s are God’s choice. The divine right to rule is in the main taken from the writings of Paul in the New Testament. So who was the Paul?

Paul was born in the year 5AD (died.67AD) and a native of the Mediterranean city of Tarsus. A Greek-speaking Jew he grew up in Jerusalem where he studied under a rabbi into Jewish doctrine. For half his life Paul was a member of the Pharisees, a Jewish section that promoted strict orthodoxy who were formidable persecutors of the followers of Christ’s teachings. Before Paul became a follower it is said he persecuted “Christians” and  caused those believers to be bound and tortured in an attempt to get them to deny their faith in Christ. He said that while traveling on the road to Damascus apparently the resurrected Jesus appeared to him in a great light where he was struck blind, but after three days his sight was restored. Now, nearly half the books of the New Testament are credited to his authorship. He is responsible for 13 of 27 books in the New Testament: Romans, 1st Corinthians, 2nd Corinthians, Galatians, Philippians, 1st Thessalonians, 2nd Thessalonians and Philemon, Ephesians, Colossians, 1st Timothy and 2nd Timothy.  He asserted that he received the Gospel from “the revelation of Jesus Christ” (does this mean he got channeled messages?). His writings are also used by churches to deny women a vote in church affairs, reject women from teaching of adult Bible classes, prevent them from serving as missionaries and generally disenfranchise women from the privileges of church leadership.

Nowhere in the bible does it mention there is a divine right of kings to rule, this is a convenient interpretation by kings, when they have authorized their own versions of the bible to attempt to justify their rulership. The bible does refer to submitting to authorities that have been selected by God (which God?). Now we know that the Church has assumed authority for religious teachings, or more accurately indoctrination. The Church has been instrumental in persecuting people who did not submit to their authority or religious dogma. It’s somewhat disturbing that the bible states you must submit to authority, for they have been established by God and if you do not submit to authority you will be punished, for “He is God’s servant an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer.”

But further concerns apart from the self-serving interpretations of the Church are these: that half the books of the New Testament are written by Paul, but he was not a disciple or followed Christ during his life, he was a strict orthodox Jew and a Roman citizen; despite never having any direct living contact with Christ he says his writings came from the revelation of Jesus Christ. And notwithstanding that the Christian religion was “created” by the Council of Nicea in 325AD on the instructions of the dying Roman Emperor Constantine, that the council would rely so heavily on the writings of one man who was a) a Roman citizen, b) not one of the disciples, c) raised a strict orthodox Jew and who persecuted Christians before his “conversion” and d) claimed to have received revelations from a spirit.

The reality to the establishment of the Christian religion is that the Roman Empire was losing its authority over the mass of people. The Roman Emperor’s had always believed in polytheism, the belief in several gods, but as they were losing control and in order to re-assert authority over the masses they created this new religion. But this religion was designed to be wholly self-serving to maintain power and control over the masses for the Roman establishment. Remember the Roman emperor’s and Caesar’s always asserted they had some divine right to rule. In there scheme the power base was to remain in Rome, being the seat of the Roman Empire. The Roman Catholic Church was thus created to maintain dominance over the people through some purported god given authority. The word “Catholic” in Latin means: universal or worldwide and this is exactly what the Catholic Church has achieved; worldwide dominance over the people through their manufactured religion, by keeping people submissive, under the control of authority and in fear of punishment for any wrongdoing in this life and the afterlife in hell.

The Bible DISLIKES WOMEN

The bible has many verses dealing with marriage, wives and adultery. Below is some text from the book.  Ephesians 5:22, says “wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word…”

Corinthians 7:7 says, “for I would that all men were even as I myself…. I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I. But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn”. Hebrews 13:4 says “let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.” stoningDeutoronomy 22:13 says “if any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her, And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid: Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel’s virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate…. But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father’s house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father’s house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you”.

god

And this is how the church, through the bible, controls and subjugates women. The book says that God will judge women if they’re sexually immoral and have sex outside of marriage (and will burn in hell). But on marriage they must submit to their husband. Now I don’t know about you but doesn’t the lord, seem a little bit hostile to women? Or is that the basis of biblical doctrine is to manipulate and control all, especially women. Because the truth is there’s not much in the bible for women to feel good about. Who are the key female figures in the bible? Eve, and we all know what they said she done. Delilah, who took away Samson’s power and Mary Magdalene, who the church had said was a prostitute. Let’s not forget Jezebel, who’s portrayed as a ruthless queen. So, there’s rarely a single positive depiction of women in the book. The majority of the women mentioned in the bible are referred to for their status as the wives, mothers or daughters.

The writings of the Apostle Paul are used by churches to deny women a vote in church affairs, reject women from serving as teachers of adult Bible classes, prevent them from serving as missionaries, and generally disenfranchise women from the duties and privileges of church leadership. The Apostle Paul in the book, 1 Timothy 2 in ch.9 says- in like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with braided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; in ch.10 – but (which becometh women professing godliness) with good works; in ch.11 – let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. He continues in ch.12 – but I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence; in ch.13 – for Adam was first formed, then Eve; in ch.14 – and Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Finally in ch.15 – notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.

The bible, as written, really does not like women. It expects women to be submissive and subservient to her husband and to the church. The Bible is really one of the most misogynistic books ever written. It seems the bible is the most hostile and hateful book with regards to women, I suppose because they’ve blamed the downfall of man on Eve.

 

 

2 Responses to “The BIBLE is FICTION”

  1. Saxon says:

    Abominable Bible Verses

    1. God himself will kill tens of thousands if it pleases him: 1st Samuel 6:19 in the King James Version: “And he smote the men of Beth-shemesh, because they had looked into the ark of the LORD, even he smote of the people fifty thousand and threescore and ten men (50,070)”. Kill 50 000 men for looking at something?

    2. You can kill a woman if she seizes a man’s private parts without his permission: Deuteronomy 25:11-1: If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity.

    3. Perversity and human trafficking condoned: “Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse.” (1 Peter 2:18)

    4. Sex slavery condoned: “When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. If she does not please the man who bought her, he may allow her to be bought back again.”
    Exodus 21: 7-8

    5. Divorce akin to debauchery: “Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.” (Luke 16:18)

    6. Cannibalism: “And the king said unto her, What aileth thee? And she answered, This woman said unto me, Give thy son, that we may eat him to day, and we will eat my son to morrow. So we boiled my son, and did eat him: and I said unto her on the next day, Give thy son, that we may eat him: and she hath hid her son….” (II Kings 6:28-29)

    7. If your genitals have been damaged, stay out of church: “He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord.”(Deuteronomy 23:1)

    8. Incest and getting drunk with dad is no problem if the world is running thin on suitable DNA donors: And the elder said to the younger Our father is old, and there is no man left on the earth, to come in unto us after the manner of the whole earth. Come, let us make him drunk with wine, and let us lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the elder went in and lay with her father: but he perceived not neither when his daughter lay down, nor when she rose up. And the next day the elder said to the younger: Behold I lay last night with my father, let us make him drink wine also to night, and thou shalt lie with him, that we may save seed of our father. They made their father drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in, and lay with him: and neither then did he perceive when she lay down, nor when she rose up. So the two daughters of Lot were with child by their father. [Genesis 19:31-36]

    9. Looking at a woman with desire is akin to adultery: “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.” (Matthew 5:28)

    10. But incestuous rape is cool: And when she had presented him the meat, he took hold of her, and said: Come lie with me, my sister. She answered him: Do not so, my brother, do not force me: for no such thing must be done in Israel. Do not thou this folly. [II Kings 13:8-12] But he would not hearken to her prayers, but being stronger overpowered her and lay with her. [II Kings 13:14]

    11. Pray in private, and if you do so in church, do so quietly: Matt 6:5 “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others.”
    12. If you offend God he will kill you: “And Er, Judah’s firstborn, was wicked in the sight of the LORD; and the LORD slew him. And Judah said unto Onan, Go in unto thy brother’s wife, and marry her, and raise up seed to thy brother. And Onan knew that the seed should not be his; and it came to pass, when he went in unto his brother’s wife, that he spilled it on the ground, lest that he should give seed to his brother. And the thing which he did displeased the LORD: wherefore he slew him also.” (Genesis 38:7-10)
    13. God smites women, children and often animals with equal gusto, he seems to equal evil and wrong doing by association, rather than by being guilty of the personal, individual act: “Behold with a great plague will the LORD smite thy people and thy children, and thy wives, and all thy goods: And thou shalt have great sickness by disease of thy bowels, until thy bowels fall out by reason of the sickness day by day.” (II Chronicles 21:14-15)

    14. Rev 21: 8 “liars–their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.” Eternal damnation for lying?

    1 Samuel 18:27 (New International Version (NIV) )

    27 David took his men with him and went out and killed two hundred Philistines and brought back their foreskins. They counted out the full number to the king so that David might become the king’s son-in-law. Then Saul gave him his daughter Michal in marriage.

    I definitely do not see how anybody can develop their spirituality or gain any kind of insight into goodness if you are fed this crap!

  2. Saxon says:

    Proof of Extra Terrestrial contact in the bible

    Ezekiel 1

    New International Version (NIV)
    Ezekiel’s Inaugural Vision

    1 In my thirtieth year, in the fourth month on the fifth day, while I was among the exiles by the Kebar River, the heavens were opened and I saw visions of God.

    2 On the fifth of the month—it was the fifth year of the exile of King Jehoiachin— 3 the word of the Lord came to Ezekiel the priest, the son of Buzi, by the Kebar River in the land of the Babylonians.[a] There the hand of the Lord was on him.

    4 I looked, and I saw a windstorm coming out of the north—an immense cloud with flashing lightning and surrounded by brilliant light. The center of the fire looked like glowing metal, 5 and in the fire was what looked like four living creatures. In appearance their form was human, 6 but each of them had four faces and four wings. 7 Their legs were straight; their feet were like those of a calf and gleamed like burnished bronze. 8 Under their wings on their four sides they had human hands. All four of them had faces and wings, 9 and the wings of one touched the wings of another. Each one went straight ahead; they did not turn as they moved.

    10 Their faces looked like this: Each of the four had the face of a human being, and on the right side each had the face of a lion, and on the left the face of an ox; each also had the face of an eagle. 11 Such were their faces. They each had two wings spreading out upward, each wing touching that of the creature on either side; and each had two other wings covering its body. 12 Each one went straight ahead. Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, without turning as they went. 13 The appearance of the living creatures was like burning coals of fire or like torches. Fire moved back and forth among the creatures; it was bright, and lightning flashed out of it. 14 The creatures sped back and forth like flashes of lightning.

    15 As I looked at the living creatures, I saw a wheel on the ground beside each creature with its four faces. 16 This was the appearance and structure of the wheels: They sparkled like topaz, and all four looked alike. Each appeared to be made like a wheel intersecting a wheel. 17 As they moved, they would go in any one of the four directions the creatures faced; the wheels did not change direction as the creatures went. 18 Their rims were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around.

    19 When the living creatures moved, the wheels beside them moved; and when the living creatures rose from the ground, the wheels also rose. 20 Wherever the spirit would go, they would go, and the wheels would rise along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels. 21 When the creatures moved, they also moved; when the creatures stood still, they also stood still; and when the creatures rose from the ground, the wheels rose along with them, because the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels.

    22 Spread out above the heads of the living creatures was what looked something like a vault, sparkling like crystal, and awesome. 23 Under the vault their wings were stretched out one toward the other, and each had two wings covering its body. 24 When the creatures moved, I heard the sound of their wings, like the roar of rushing waters, like the voice of the Almighty, like the tumult of an army. When they stood still, they lowered their wings.

    25 Then there came a voice from above the vault over their heads as they stood with lowered wings. 26 Above the vault over their heads was what looked like a throne of lapis lazuli, and high above on the throne was a figure like that of a man. 27 I saw that from what appeared to be his waist up he looked like glowing metal, as if full of fire, and that from there down he looked like fire; and brilliant light surrounded him. 28 Like the appearance of a rainbow in the clouds on a rainy day, so was the radiance around him.

    This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord. When I saw it, I fell facedown, and I heard the voice of one speaking.

    In my opinion, this is first hand contact with ET’s..In defence of Ezekiel, he could not understand the technology before him and could only equate it to God.

    Ask Christians/Jews what this is and all they can say is, it is god or gods power….bleh!!

    Prime Creator does not need any type of flying machine!

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.