Interesting PERSPECTIVES

 

Another very interesting PERSPECTIVE                                                     18 Feb 2008

alddousAll you hhhhhoggly girl chasers, facebook desperados, internet abusers and the plain bored and lonely 21st century victims of their forefathers ignunss…………. pay particular attention to this article. And if you haven’t read Aldous Huxleys; Brave New World – you should consider purchasing a copy to keep your other book (the A to Z) company. (Yeah…….. I looked……….. and only 2 out of the 7, I sent this mail to have any books, let alone read any, and one of you is the only female [who reads books] on this recipients list.)  So all you intellectually lazy, sledgeheads, go on and ask me with your full chest and flared nostrils…….

“You calling me stoopid, Wob, just because I don’t read them boring books, you keep going on abaaat?” Nope!!

‘I’m calling you a blissfully ignunt, TV abusing, broadsheet allergic, ‘in-depth’ averse, “what was the credit cwunch, Rob?”, fother mucker!’ ‘But hey…………. that’s cool…………………..as long as you don’t breed!’ “Yu get mi?”

You decide to breed with some equally ignunt, half blind, precooked food heating, guess the gender creature (like my friend with the head shape that from any angle causes one to squint…. “to be sure!”) and your woeful ignunss becomes a HIGH hurdle for your child(ren) to leap……..way before the 10,000,000m hurdles ‘race of life’ begins in earnest. So keep your tings ‘inna yu pants’ and no cussing’s coming your way – and you know I can/will cuss…………….. whether it’s my business or not!!.  There’s that saying: ‘What’s the difference between a man than can’t read, and one that won’t read?’ – Tell me, guy?

Anyway, A Brave New World, is a powerful book.  They say it’s a toss up between Orwells ‘1984‘ and Huxleys ‘Brave New World’ for the most prescient prediction of the future, and it’s swung back and forth depending on the way the elites have chosen to take the p…. out of we………….. continually……………….. because we’re, collectively, quite shockingly stooopid.  And if you were to check out Aldous himself, you’ll find him to be a very interesting character indeed, and you’ll see the book in a wholly different light.
When you see how “connected” he was….. for him to produce such a book………………..well………… I’ll leave you to check it out what he may have been doing…………………….. not knowing how easily we’d be turned off of reading, and so accumulating knowledge……………. and enabling us to quit being tricked.

Beg you one thing…………….. don’t follow these peoples. (Check the last 2 paragraphs, in particular.)  Not only are citizens ignorant about essential scientific, civic and cultural knowledge, she said, but they also don’t think it matters.

If you’re NOT doing anything WRONG…….                               3 Oct 2012

 ……do you have anything to worry about?  Some say you don’t. Because you’re doing nothing wrong. To which I respond – “Why do you have curtains in your bathroom?” or “Why do you not write all your letters on a postcard instead of placing it in an envelope?”

hide

To which the answer is universal. It’s just Privacy. You should be able to scratch your ….llocks without thinking you may end up on some crass TV show years down the line.  And if they want to prevent crime – get all those police you have sitting around, waiting to ‘contain’ the protesting public………and set them about patrolling the streets for the fother mucking public – for a fother mucking change.

They’ll lose the tapes, when they put a bullet in someone and use the camera’s for every kind of monitoring…..before they look for crime. And given they have access to alllllllllllllllllllllllll those photos on two-feistybook and TWITter – people no longer have to commit a crime, or be suspected of……………..to be identified. And that just isn’t the way it should be. Unless one is a member of the ‘it’s just the way it is’ posse. 

A man that sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither” – Thomas Jefferson. Now………………………………….. how long ago must he have said that?  Look at how much we’ve, collectively, learned since then.

We just can’t get our collective heads out of our collective @rrsoles.

They Prefer to administer to Women

…because women, generally, trust ENNI-EFFING-FING authority tells them (I want to hear someone holla back to the contrary)
 
Just look at the relatively new Autism epidemic – susssssssspected to be caused by the nnnnnnnnneeewww MMR vaccine, which the elite DO NOT give to their children, but are happy to sign-off as good for [y]ours.
 
I didn’t even hear of a single instance of Autism throughout my entire childhood, past my teens, twenties and into my thirties – did you? Then, suddenly, we have every other child suffering from this ‘head-top spinning’ thing – Autism. And we all wait for the TV to tell us what the hell this NEW thing is. And if the TV says nothing…..so do [collective] we. Not so? And (I cry for today’s children) I don’t know a single mother that ‘checked/queried‘ with the quack before they allowed complete strangers to inject their beloved (oh deary me) children with the unknown (to the mothers and her families) chemicals – would you respect people that allowed you do that to their children? Not even a pig/cow would allow that – unless they’ve been tamed and live in an [artificial] farm yard waiting to milked or slaughtered (hmmm)
  • NOTE – If you allowed strangers to inject your children with….well…what was it? And your children are OK – You’re LUCKY. Dig dat!! LUCK-KY.
Now, we know what vaccinations were originally meant for – like television. To do good things for us all. But NOW…..just like television, food, school, mortgages; among many many examples…..they’re used to ONLY phuck up our minds/lives, among many other things.Anyhow, check what they may (“shyeah, you mean DEFINITELY”) have planned for our women. Fortunately, though late, our African Empress’s are just waking up to this devilism but may have a hard time avoiding due to the recent NEWbola pandemic sweeping the African countries where there is plenty of ‘stuff’.
 
_______________________________________________________________________________________
 
September 15, 2014
 
“When the State offers and even insists on giving everybody something, you know you’re in trouble. Well, that’s the whole point, isn’t it? Leaving the individual out of the equation. Treating the population like a single Blob.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
 
Before we get to vaccines, I want to give you a quote about fluorides, just to set the stage. Stan Freni is a researcher who, in 1994, wrote a paper about fluorides, the substances in many toothpastes, also pumped intentionally into the drinking water of many communities and cities. Funny thing is, Stan Freni wrote his paper as an employee for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The title of the paper is “Exposure to High Fluoride Concentrations in Drinking Water is Associated With Decreased Birth Rates.” It was published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (v.42, pp.109-121, 1994). Freni writes:
 
“A US database of drinking water systems was used to identify index counties with water systems reporting fluoride levels of at least 3ppm (parts per million)…the annual total fertility rate (TFR) for women in the age range 10-49 yr. was calculated for the period 1970-1988…Most regions showed an association of decreasing TFR with increasing fluoride levels.”
 
Increasing fluoride levels, lower fertility rates. Depopulation here in the US, right in your water. So don’t imagine depopulation is an esoteric subject.Let’s move on. You have to understand that every promoted so-called “pandemic” is an extended sales pitch for vaccines. And not just a vaccine against the “killer germ” of the moment. We’re talking about a psyop to condition the population to vaccines in general. There is much available literature on vaccines used for depopulation experiments. The research is ongoing. Undoubtedly, we only know a fraction of what is happening behind closed laboratory doors. Depopulation has several objectives. Along one vector, it is an elite strategy designed to get rid of large numbers of people, in key areas of the world, where local revolutions would interfere with outside corporations staging a complete takeover of fertile land and rich natural resources.
 
An astonishing journal paper. November, 1993. FASEB Journal, volume 7, pp.1381-1385. Authors—Stephan Dirnhofer et al. Dirnhofer was a member of the Institute for Biomedical Aging Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.  A quote from the paper: “Our study provides insights into possible modes of action of the birth control vaccine promoted by the Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO (World Health Organization).”  A birth control vaccine? Yes.
 
A vaccine whose purpose is to achieve non-pregnancy where it ordinarily could occur. This particular vaccine was apparently just one of several anti-fertility vaccines the Task Force was promoting. Yes. There is a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines at WHO. This journal paper focuses on a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin B (hCG). There is a heading in the paper (p.1382) called “Ability of antibodies to neutralize the biological activity of hCG.” The authors are trying to discover whether a state of non-fertility can be achieved by blocking the normal activity of hCG.
 
Another journal paper. The British Medical Bulletin, volume 49, 1993. “Contraceptive Vaccines.” The authors—RJ Aitken et al. From the MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
 
“Three major approaches to contraceptive vaccine development are being pursued at the present time. The most advanced approach, which has already reached the stage of phase 2 clinical trials, involves the induction of immunity against human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). Vaccines are being engineered … incorporating tetanus or diptheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides … Clinical trials have revealed that such preparations are capable of stimulating the production of anti-hCG antibodies…”
 
The authors are talking about creating an immune response against a female hormone. Training a woman’s body to react against one of its own secreted hormones. The authors state, “The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”
 
Stop the female body from recognizing a state of pregnancy. Get the body to treat the natural hormone hCG as an intruder, a disease agent, and mobilize the forces of the immune system against it. Create a synthetic effect, an engineered effect, by which the mother’s “maternal endocrine system” does not swing into gear when pregnancy occurs. The result? The embryo in the mother is swept away by her next period—since hGC, which signals the existence of the pregnancy and halts menstruation cycles, is now treated as a disease entity.
 
The authors put it this way: “In principle, the induction of immunity against hGC should lead to a sequence of normal, or slightly extended, menstrual cycles during which any pregnancies would be terminated…”  Miscarriage would then be the “normal” state of affairs. These authors leave no doubt about who the target of this vaccine would be: “During the next decade the world’s population is set to rise by around 500 million. Moreover, because the rates of population growth in the developing countries of Africa, South America, and Asia will be so much greater than the rest of the world, the distribution of this dramatic population growth will be uneven…”
 
Two other vaccine methods are described. They “aim to prevent conception by interfering with the intricate cascade of interactive events that characterize the union of male and female gametes at fertilization.”  The diptheria and tetanus vaccines would function as a social and political mask-to hide the sterilizing intent, as millions of women in the Third World would receive vaccines they’re told would protect them against infections and disease.
 
A letter to a medical journal, The Lancet, p.1222, Volume 339, May 16, 1992. “Cameroon: Vaccination and politics.” Peter Ndumbe and Emmanuel Yenshu, the authors of this letter, report on their efforts to analyze widespread popular resistance to a tetanus vaccine given in the northwest province of Cameroon.  Two of the reasons women rejected the vaccine: it was given only to “females of childbearing age,” and people heard that a “sterilizing agent” was present in the vaccine. The late well-known journalist, Alexander Cockburn, on the op ed page of the LA Times on September 8, 1994, reviewed the infamous Kissinger-commissioned 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200, “which addressed population issues.”
 
“… the true concern of Kissinger analysts [in Memorandum 200] was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the ‘political consequences’ of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability … With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] ‘the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.'”
 
In other words, too many people equals disruption for the transnational corporations, who steal nations from those very people. 
Does this remind you of what is happening in West Africa now, re “the Ebola crisis?” Lockdown. Borders sealed. Over the past five years, several vaccine campaigns—and who knows what other vectors for the transmission of toxic elements to the population.
 
Cockburn notes that the writers of the Kissinger memo “favored sterilization over food aid.” He goes on to say that “By 1977, Reimart Ravenholt, the director of AID’s [US Agency for International Development] population program, was saying that his agency’s goal was to sterilize one-quarter of the world’s women.” There were unconfirmed reports from the Philippines and Mexico that their 1993 tetanus vaccination programs—which were supposedly administered only to women of childbearing age—involved multiple injections.
 
Tetanus vaccine protocols indicate that one injection is good for ten years. Therefore, multiple injections would indicate another motive for the vaccinations—such as the anti-fertility effect of hCG planted in the vaccine. My inquiries to Philippine officials went unanswered.  The Population Research Institute, in the November/December 1996 issue of its Review, published a report by David Morrison. Morrison stated, “Philippine women may have been unwittingly vaccinated against their own children, a recent study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) has indicated.
 
“The study tested random samples of a tetanus vaccine for the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone essential to the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy … The PMA’s positive test results indicate that just such an abortifacient may have been administered to Philippine women without their consent.
 
“The PMA notified the Philippine Department of Health (PDOH) of these findings in a 16 September letter signed by the researchers and certified by its President. Using an immunological assay developed by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, a three-doctor research panel tested forty-seven vials of tetanus vaccine collected at random from various health centers in Luzon and Mindanao. Nine were found to contain hCG in levels ranging from 0.191680 mIU/ml to 3.046061 mIU/ml. These vaccines, most of which were labeled as of Canadian origin, were supplied by the World Health Organization as part of a WHO-sponsored [sterilization] vaccination program.”
 
Morrison’s article would seem to indicate that the vials of vaccine tested came from a widespread immunization campaign rather than from a small pilot study of a few women. The Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation was created at the World Health Organization in 1973. Ute Sprenger, writing in Biotechnology and Development Monitor (December 1995) describes the Task Force: “…a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D…such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG.”
 
Sprenger indicates that, as of 1995, there were several large groups researching these vaccines. Among them:  WHO/HRP. HRP is the Special Progamme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, located in Switzerland. It is funded by “the governments of Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Germany and Canada, as well as the UNFPA and the World Bank.”
 
The Population Council. It’s a US group funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institutes of Health [a US federal agency], and the US Agency for International Development [notorious for its collaborations with the CIA].  National Institute of Immunology. Located in India, “major funders are the Indian government, the Canadian International Development Research Center and the [ubiquitous] Rockefeller Foundation.”  The Center for Population Research, located at the US National Institute of Child Health and Development [!], which is part of the US National Institutes of Health.  The Lancet, 4 June, 1998, p.1272: “During the recent National Immunisation Campaign (vaccination for childhood diseases and tetanus toxoid for pregnant women), in some villages [of Thailand] the women escaped and hid in the bushes thinking that they were going to be given injections to stop them having children.”
 
AP, Boston Globe, October 10, 1992, “Birth-control vaccine is reported in India”: “Scientists said yesterday they have created the first birth-control shot for women, effective for an entire year…[after which] a booster shot is needed.” There are other citations from published medical literature—but you get the idea: vaccines as depopulation instruments. And the hCG versions I refer to appear to be crude efforts. Who knows what levels of sophistication have been achieved in secret? West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu, Ebola—the real motive for promoting these “pandemics” is the follow-up: vaccines. To a highly significant degree, the CDC and the World Health Organization are PR agencies, whose job is to convince the public that stepping up, rolling up their sleeves, and submitting to shots containing germs and toxic chemicals is the most natural and wise action possible.
 
Yes, and ignorance is strength.

 

 

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Social Widgets powered by AB-WebLog.com.